In many school districts,
professional development (PD) workshops and trainings are offered with the goal
of improving student achievement (Whitehead, Jensen, & Boschee, 2013). Many teachers have participated in these PD workshops
and training with the hopes of learning valuable information that they can take
back and use within their classrooms. Typically, during these workshops, teachers gather in a room for one to three hours
and listen to a lecture about an isolated concept or topic. Oftentimes, they
leave wondering if it was worth participating in as they have not gained any
valuable knowledge or skills related to improving their practice.
Professional development, in which teachers
are not connected or leave feeling as if it was a waste of their time, is
ineffective in improving instruction and student achievement. According to Whitehead, Jensen, and Boschee
(2013), professional development should be evaluated and measured to determine
the effectiveness of teaching practices.
The evaluation of PD is the most valuable part of continuous improvement
in supporting teachers and learners. Teachers
who participate in high- quality, well designed, and though-out professional development
opportunities are more apt to implement the practices within their classrooms. Therefore, those in a leadership position must know how to conduct the evaluation of PD as well as the evaluation of instructional strategies (2013).
So, how do you recognize great PD
opportunities? First, they are relevant
to teachers and focus on the learning theory instead of presenting
abstract ideas about how to teach content to students. They also provide the most recent research
based teaching strategies and methods. Effective PD takes place in a
collaborative setting where teachers share with one another. Teachers need a collaborative culture in which
engage in collective inquiry and the continuous improvement process. In addition, PD
opportunities should be structured in a way that it presents strategies that
changes teacher behaviors and routines.
It is hard to change a teacher’s content knowledge (Desimone & Garet, 2015). However, it is much
easier to change behaviors and routines.
Furthermore, Professional development is much more effective when it is
clear, powerful, and focused. This type of PD can lead to higher quality
teaching which results in higher student achievement. Lastly, professional
development opportunities should never be a one-time opportunity. It is an
ongoing and continuous self-improvement opportunity for teachers. The success of professional development can be measured by the teacher's ability to comprehend the school's mission and plan for improving teaching and learning (2013). It is only by supporting teachers through PD opportunities that their practice can improve thus they can improve student achievement.
The following is a short video about professional development possibilities.
The following is a short video about professional development possibilities.
References
Desimone, L., & Garet, M. (2015). Best practices in teachers's professional development in the united states. Psychology, Society, & Education, 7(3).
Whitehead, B., Jensen, D., & Boschee, F. (2013). Planning for Technology: A Guide for School Administrators, Technology Coordinators, and Curriculum Leaders. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.
Unfortunately, I have attended many PD sessions where I left feeling like I have wasted my time. I think if you have taught for at least 10 years or more you have experienced at least one session like that. Thankfully, my PD sessions in the last couple of years has gotten better. I actually was given the opportunity to lead PD sessions for teachers this last semester. At the beginning, I offered a survey to the teachers to see what topics they might be interested in learning more about. The response was great and I built my weekly sessions around their needs. Unfortunately, I have not had such a great turn out. Many weeks I had 2 (the same two) come and the last few no attendees. I question myself in did I do something wrong to cause this downfall. In the article, "Does it make a difference? Evaluating Professional Development", they offer five guidelines to evaluate the professional development program to determine if it was effective. As I read through this article, I notices areas of my PD that need to be changed. Over the summer, I plan to reevaluate my first PD session trainings and prepare better for next year. I think every school system needs to take a careful evaluation of the PD that is offered and evaluate to see how effective it truly is.
ReplyDeleteReferences:
Educational Leadership:Redesigning Professional Development:Does It
Make a Difference? Evaluating Professional Development. (n.d.).
Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-
leadership/mar02/vol59/num06/Does-It-Make-a-Difference%C2%A2-
Evaluating-Professional-Development.aspx
Lori,
ReplyDeleteAs my tech team and I plan for next year, professional development is often a focal point of our conversations. I don't want to waste anyone's time and I want to be certain that it will contribute to positive change. Whitehead, Jensen, and Boschee (2013) state that, "The reality of technology reform in schools is that leaders should not be working on ad hoc practices of professional development" (p.60). And I feel like this is often the case. Our goal for next year is to integrate both curriculum PLCs with the technology PD so that it can be meaningful, relevant, and immediately applied. I think these are key.
Whitehead, B., Jensen, D., & Boschee, F. (2013). Planning for technology: A guide for school administrators, technology coordinators, and curriculum leaders. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.
Lori, I appreciate you including specific indicators to help determine quality PD. Specifically, in the instructional coaching class, Marzano and Simms (2013) encouraged instructional coaches to collect data in regard to their participants to create intentional professional developments. Furthermore, I think you make an excellent point in regard to measuring effectiveness of professional development to how the development aligns with vision and mission of the school.
ReplyDeleteMarzano, R. and Simms, J. (2013). Coaching classroom instruction. Bloomington, IN: Marzano Research Laboratory.